A.S.TRIPATHI
RAJENDAR PRASAD MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
This revision is directed against an order dated 7-9-J993 passed by Vith Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad in Criminal Case No. 1021 of 1993 directing that application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , he treated as complaint.
2. I have heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned A. G. A. appearing for the State.
3. In this particular case it is alleged that a dacoity had taken place at the house of the applicant on 6-8- 1993. It is alleged that the applicant want to the police station concerned to lodge a report. The police of the Police Station Manda District Allahabad did not lodge the report and also did not register the case. The applicant sent a telegram to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Allahabad same day, which is Annexure No. 1 to the affidavit filed in support of the revision.
4. The police did not investigate the case. Then an application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , was moved before the Vlth Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad. On that application the impugned order dated 7-9-1993 was passed wherein the application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , was treated as complaint. The learned Magistrate directed that t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.