SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 1

A.S.TRIPATHI
RAJENDAR PRASAD MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


A. S. TRIPATHI, J.

This revision is directed against an order dated 7-9-J993 passed by Vith Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad in Criminal Case No. 1021 of 1993 directing that application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , he treated as complaint.

2. I have heard learned Counsel for the revisionist and learned A. G. A. appearing for the State.

3. In this particular case it is alleged that a dacoity had taken place at the house of the applicant on 6-8- 1993. It is alleged that the applicant want to the police station concerned to lodge a report. The police of the Police Station Manda District Allahabad did not lodge the report and also did not register the case. The applicant sent a telegram to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Allahabad same day, which is Annexure No. 1 to the affidavit filed in support of the revision.

4. The police did not investigate the case. Then an application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , was moved before the Vlth Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad. On that application the impugned order dated 7-9-1993 was passed wherein the application under Section 156 (3), Cr. P. C. , was treated as complaint. The learned Magistrate directed that t


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top