SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 202

MARKANDEY KATJU
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.S.DIWEKAR, Noor Ullah,

M. KATJN, J.

This writ petition has been filed for a writ of certiorari against the impugned orders dated 15-2-1992 and order dated 27-6-1992.

2. I have heard Shri Noor Ullah holding the brief of Sri A. S. Diwekar Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel On 1-9-1992 this court granted one months time to the standing counsel to file counter affidavit but no counter affidavit has been filed. In the circumstances I am treating allegations in the petition to be correct.

3. The petitioner had applied for licence for a revolver in 1990 before District Magistrate, Firozabad. This application was rejected by the District Magistrate by order dated 22-12-1990. Thereafter the petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner, Agra Division, who allowed the appeal on 22-10-1990 and remanded the matter to the District Magistrate vide Annexure No. 2. Thereafter the District Magistrate again dismissed the application on 15-2-1992 vide Annexure No. 3 and his order was upheld in appeal on 27-6-1992 vide order Annexure No. 6. Aggrieved this petition has been filed before this Court.

4. A perusal of the order of the District Magistrate dated 15-2-1992 shows that there was no averment






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top