S.C.VERMA, R.K.GULATI
Commissioner of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Bishambhar Dayal and Co. – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE are two applications under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") arising out of a common order passed by the Income-tax Appellate tribunal. These applications have been made at the instance of the Revenue and pertain to the assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89. In these applications, the following common question has been proposed : "whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in directing to allow depreciation when the Income-tax Officer had given a clear finding in his assessment order that the income was estimated after allowing admissible depreciation ?"
( 2 ) THE assessee is a contractor. The Income-tax Officer rejecting the book profits computed the income by applying a flat rate. In the assessment year 1987-88, he worked out the taxable income by applying a net rate of ten per cent. and observed : "the assessee has claimed depreciation. The depreciation claimed by the assessee is not allowable when net rate is applied when working the income. "
( 3 ) IN the other year 1988-89 also a net rate of ten per cent. was applied but there are no obse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.