A.S.TRIPATHI
KAILASH NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
Heard learned Counsel for the revisionists and learned A. G. A. for State. Learned Magistrate has passed an order under Section 111, Cr. P. C. calling upon the revisionists to show-cause on the date fixed on 8- H-1993 or to furnish the bond of Rs. 25,000 and sureties of the same amount.
2. A perusal of the Section 111, Cr. P. C. shows that it is the duty of the Magistrate to proceed under the provisions of Sections 107, 108, 109 and 110, Cr. P. C. and enquire upon the information received, the Magistrate has to set forth the substance of the information and call upon the person concerned to show-cause as to why the amount of the bond to be executed the terms for which it is to be in force and the number, character and class of sureties, is specified. In this particular case the learned Magistrate has psssed this order on an information received from the S. H. O. Kydganj, Allahabad and calling upon the revisionists to show-cause as to why they could not be held to furnish the bonds required fixing 8- 11-1993.
3. It has been averred in the affidavit that on the date fixed no action was taken by the Magistrate against the revisionists, who appear before the Court. Wh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.