SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 534

N.L.GANGULY
MANGAROO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.R.S.Chauhan,

N. L. GANGULY, J.

This is an application under Section 482, Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the order of the learned revisional Court dismissing the revision barred by limitation.

2. In a criminal complaint under Sections 322, 147, 504, I. P. C. , the applicant, Man-garoo, along with 3 of his family members were arrayed as accused person. The notices were issued. The personal attendance of all the accused persons were exempted by the order of the Court. The complainant of the case moved an application for cancelling the order exemptaig the personal attendance of the accused, Mangaroo, who in fact is employed in Middle-East at Dubai. The personal attendance of the accused was exempted and he left India for joining the service at Dubai without obtaining prior permission of the Court. Therefore, an application for cancellation of exemption of personal attendance of applicant was moved which was allowed. Notices were issued for personal appearance in the Court. Since the applicant was not in India, the applicant moved an application giving all the facts, but the learned Magistrate passed

order for appearance before the Court and issued process for his appearance in the Court on the





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top