SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(All) 644

GIRIDHAR MALAVIYA
INDRA – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR AGARWAL – Respondent


Heard Sri R. N. Sharma and Sri A. N. Bhargava learned Counsel for the applicants and Opp. Party No. 1 respectively. Both the parties are agree able that this matter may finally be disposed of at the stage of admission itself. In this case admittedly applicant Smt. Indra got her abortion carried out in a Nursing Home by a competent Medical Practitioner. In view of the fact that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 permits termination of pregnancy by a registered Medical Prac titioner, the pendency of a Criminal Case against the applicants in this case does not appear to be justified. It is not the case of the complainant that Smt. Indra was not willing to get her pregnancy terminated or that the other applicants compelled to get her pregnan cy terminated. Accordingly the prosecution of the applicants under Section 313, Indian Penal Code would not be justified.

2. Accordingly this revision is allowed. At the stage of admission itself and the order passed by the IInd Judicial Magistrate, Meerut on 9. 9. 1991 in case No. 1335 of 1991, Arun Kumar Agrawal V. Smt. Indra and others is quashed.

Revision allowed.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top