SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 141

KAMLESHWAR NATH
HAFIZ MOHD NOORULLAH – Appellant
Versus
NAZIR AHMAD – Respondent


KAMLESHWAR NATH, J.

Criminal Misc. Case No. 379 of 1987 is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which has been directed to be connected with Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 1987, hence the 2 cases are being decided by this common judgment.

2. The petitioner-appellant was married to Smt. Nighat Parveen on 19-11-1978. They be got a son on 16- 12-1979. According to Smt. Nighat Parveen, his name is Nazir Ahmad, the opposite party-respondent; according to the petitioner-appellant, the name of his son is Azizullah and not Nazir Ahmad.

3. From 18-12-1980 Nighat Parveen along with her son started living at her parents house. She complained that the petitioner-appellant had beaten and had turned her out of the house and therefore she went to her parents house and was not being maintained by the petitioner-appellant. She there fore applied to the concerned Magistrate on 5-1-1981 for maintenance for her self and for the opposite-party-respondent under Section 125, Cr. P. C. 4. The motion was opposed by the petitioner-appellant who said, inter alia, that Smt. Nighat Parveen had left his house along with the child of her own accord and without his meeting any cruelty to her
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top