SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 129

M.M.LAL, PARMESHWAR DAYAL
CHANDRA PAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


M. M. LAL, J.

Both these appeals arise from the same judgment and order dated 9-3-1981 passed by Sri V. K. Jain, Sessions Judge, Unnao whereby he has convicted Chandrapal appellant under Sections 302/34, IPC and 323, IPC and has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and six months R. I. respectively, thereunder and has convicted Bhagwandin appellant under Section 302, IPC and has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life.

2. Dori and Kusehar were two real brothers. Dori had a son named Dori. Bhagwandin and Chandra Pal appellants are the sons of said Dori. Kusehar on the other hand had two sons named PW 1 Dayal injured and Khilari who has been murdered in this incident Scot. Lachhminia injured is the widow of said Khilari. They have a son named Chhedi. Smt. Rajola is the wife of said Chhedi. The parties are the residents of village Bhadin, P. S. Purwa, district Unnao.

3. The wife of Dori had died in the month of Asarh, prior to this incident. Dori had, however not performed per last rites. The marriage of aforesaid Chhedi, son of Khilari deceased was about to take place and according to the custom the said marriage could not be performed till the last rites of the wife















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top