SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(All) 655

S.S.AHMED, VIRENDRA KUMAR
CHANDRA BHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


VERANDA KUMAR, J.

These are an appeal against the judgment and order, dated 11-5-1982 passed by Sessions Judge, Unnao convicting each of the two appellants Chandra Bhal and Ramesh under Section 302 read with Section 34, I. P. C. and sentencing them to imprisonment for life.

2. Informant Mangal (P. W. 1) has two sons Mool Chand and Sheo Prasad (P. W. 3) besides the third son Mahadeo (deceased ). Prosecution case is state a briefly. On 25-12-1979 that is, about 2 years before the incident in question Shanker, the brother of accused Chandra Bhal was murdered. Mangal and all his three sons were prosecuted for the murder but they were acquitted into month the sawan, that is, about 3-4 months before the occurrence in question. Hence, relation between Mangal and his sons on the one hand and the accused Chandra Bhal on the other, were strained and it was the motive for commission of the murder of Mahadeo by Chandra. Bhal and his friend and associate Ramesh, On 3-11- 1981 in the early morning Mangai and his three sons had gone to the field of Ambey Lala which was taken by them on Batati. The field of Ambey Lala situated towards the east of the village Abadi. Adjoining the field there existe
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top