VISHNU SAHAI, KAMAL KISHORE
Raj Nath Pandey – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate, Faizabad – Respondent
( 1 ) THROUGH this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner-detenu Raj Nath Pandey has impugned the order dated 16-7-2002, passed by the first respondent - Mr. Alok Kumar, District Magistrate, Faizabad, detaining him under Section 3 (2) of The National Security Act. The detention order, along with the grounds of detention, which are also dated 16-7-2002, was served on the petitioner-detenu on 16-7-2002 itself and their true copies are annexed as annexures 1 and 2 respectively to the writ petition.
( 2 ) THE prejudicial activities of the petitioner-detenu impelling the first respondent to pass the impugned detention order against him are contained in the grounds of detention (Annexure 2), a perusal of which shows that the impugned order is founded on a solitary crime number (Cr.), namely, Cr. No. 263/2002 under Sections 147/148/149/307/302/504 IPC of Police Station Poora Kalandar, District Faizabad registered on the basis of a complaint dated 18-6-2002 lodged by Smt. Kalawati Devi. The details pertaining to the said Cr. as contained in the grounds of detention, in short, are as under :- On 18-6-2002 at 6. 00 P. M. the det
referred to : Dharmendra Suganchand Chelawat v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.