SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 283

ANJANI KUMAR
HARI KANT ALIAS RAJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.B.Yadav, C.P.MISHRA,

ANJANI KUMAR, J.

By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the orders dated 16-7-1997 and 5-5-1998, Annexures-3 and 5 to the writ petition, respectively, passed by Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 under the provisions of Sections 17 and 18 of the Arms Act, revoking/cancelling the licence of his fire-arm.

2. Heard learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been served with a show-cause notice dated 14-11-1995 under Section 17 of the Arms Act asking him to show-cause as to why his fire-arm licence may not be cancelled, in reply thereto he has filed an objection stating therein that he was never involved in criminal case and he has not misused his gun as is alleged in the show-cause notice. The further contention of the petitioners Counsel is that only four cases have been registered against him such as Crime No. 58 of 1972, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 I. P. C. ; Crime No. 100 of 1976, under Sections 352/323 I. P. C. ; Crime No. 45 of 1992, under Sections 504/506 I. P. C. and







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top