JAGDISH BHALLA, P.K.CHATTERJEE, JOSHI
SATYA NARAIN SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) AGGRIEVED by non-inclusion of the name of the petitioner, who is a Member of Indian administrative Services, in the panel for the Post of Additional Secretary and Secretary in the government of India, petitioner filed Original Application No. 39 of 1998, before the Central administrative Tribunal. Petitioner inter-alia also prayed therein; that the opposite parties may be directed to ignore the A. C. Rs. awarded to him for the years 1994-95, 1995-96 and 1996- 97, while considering him for empanelment as Secretary to the Government of India and the Union of India, and the Cabinet Secretary to the Government of India may also be directed to streamline the system of recording A. C. Rs of the Members of Indian Administrative Services.
( 2 ) CENTRAL Administrative Tribunal by the judgment and order dated 28. 4. 2000, rejected the O. A. No. 39 of 1998 on the grounds that it is not at all necessary to examine the shortcomings in the format of A. C. R. in Public Interest. Secondly, the relief claimed by the applicant can be well considered and examined in the light of Para 14 of the Scheme which provides that while due regard would be given to seniority, filling up
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.