RAM JANAM SINGH, J.

This revision has been preferred by Raghubir Prasad against the judgment dated 3-6-99 passed by Additional Collector First Class, Kotdwar.

2. The facts of the case are that the plaintiff-opposite-party filed a suit under Section 229-B of the UPZA and LR and against one Makhan Dass on the ground of adverse possession. Notice to the op posite-party was issued on 2-4-93 for 21-4-93. No proceeding took place on this date and the date was adjourned for 29-4-95. Again on this date the case was adjourned for 11-5-93. No proceeding could take place on this date and the case was again adjourned for 26-5-93. On 29-4-93 an ap plication was moved by plaintiff Mahant Govind Dass for service by publication. On this application no orders were passed on that date but on 11- 5-93 notices were issued because the Presiding Officer was busy in other official work. The order for publication was passed on 11- 5-93 which was published in one local paper jayant under the seal and signature of Sub-Divisional Officer on 11-5-93. On 26-5-93 the order to proceed ex-pane was passed and on 28-5-93 the case was adjourned for 3-6-93. On this date oral evidence was recorded and on 2-7-93 the su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document