This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 1-11-1980 passed by J. M. 1st Class, Varanasi acquitting the accused Jai Shree of the charge under Section 3 R. P. U. P. Act feeling aggrieved by the acquittal of the accused.

2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Counsel for the accused.

3. The prosecution case is that the accused was apprehended by the Sub-In spector RPF while he was found in suspi cious circumstances on the Railway track. On search he was found to contain dynamo belt measuring 8-1/2 cubit in length and 6 anguls in breadth. The Sub-Inspector prepared a recovery memo on the basis of which the case was registered. The dynamo belt was sent for expert opinion. The Head Train Examiner (Electrical) found that the dynamo belt was in two pieces joined with 4 fastener. The length of one piece was 2. 5 meters whereas the length of small piece was 1. 25 metres. On big piece words cret was written by paint.

4. The Head Train Examiner (Electri cal) reported that the said dynamo belt was railway property and was not available in open market nor it is auctioned by the railways. He estimated its approximate cost at Rs. 49