SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 149

RAM JANAM SINGH
CHANDRABHAN ETC – Appellant
Versus
BAL SWAROOP – Respondent


RAM JANAM SINGH, J.

Chandrabhan and others have filed this second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31-1- 1995 passed by learned Additional Commissioner, Meerut.

2. Facts of the case are that Fateh Singh and others, the fathers of the appel lants, filed a suit under Section 176 of the UPZA and LR Act before the learned trial Court against defendants Charan Singh, Sheeraj Singh and Shoran Sing claiming 1/4th share each for the plaintiff as well as remaining three defendants. The defen dants did not oppose the partition suit. The learned trial Court after perusal of the oral and documentary evidence and also a compromise between the parties decreed the suit accordingly on 21-9-77. After a lapse of even years on 10-10-1984 Fateh Singh moved an application for prepara tion of final decree. Defendants respon dents opposed that the final decree should not be prepared on the basis of the prelimi nary decree passed on 21-9-1977. The learned trial Court on the basis of this application moved by Fateh Singh and the objection raised by the defendants respon dents set aside the decree dated 21-9-1977 and fixed the case for further necessary action. The plaintiff- appellants filed a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top