SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 438

B.K.SHARMA
GIRJA SHANKER – Appellant
Versus
D D C BHADOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.Paul,

B. K. SHARMA, J.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties. In this writ petition the petitioners Grja Shankar and Bateshwar Nath have challenged the order dated 13-11-1995 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bhadoi, Camp at Gyanpur in Revision No. 660/652 under Section 48 of the Consolidation of Holdings Act, Rama Shankar and Others. v. Ram Jiyawan and Others. , village Deegh Uperwar, Ta. Kaudh, lehsil Gyanpur, district Bhadoi, whereby he allowed the revision and set aside the order dated 2-1-93 passed

by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) in Appeal No. 6/1667, Ram Jiavmn v. Gauri Shankar and Others. , and Appeal No. 1883/90-93, Devi Shankar and Others. v. Rama Shankar and Others.

2. The facts leading to this writ petition are that respondent Nos. 2 and 3 Rama Shankar and Daya Shankar, filed objections under Section 9 of the U. P. Consolida tion of Holdings Act in respect of Khata No. 1035, that in the proceedings relating to the said objections (case No. 6374-6382) a compromise dated 19-1-1988 was filed and verified, that the Consolidation Officer accepted the same and passed an order in its terms on 19-1-1988, that at that time Ram Jiyawan, father of the petitioners,



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top