The petitioner have sought writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 30-10-1992, passed by respon dent No. 2 setting aside the order of Con solidation Officer, dated 27-3-1992, and the order dated 24-9-1993 passed by respondent No. 1 dismissing the revision against the aforesaid order.

2. The facts of the case in brief are that during consolidation proceedings, in the basic year Khatauni the name of Ranga Singh, respondent No. 3 and Mangal Singh, father of respondent No. 4 was recorded in Khata No. 13 and in Khata No, 14 the name of Mangal Singh was recorded. In these two Khatas the name of Jagtar Singh was recorded in class-L. Jag-tar Singh filed objection claiming bhumid-hari rights on the basis of adverse posses sion. The Consolidation Officer allowed the objection on 27-3-1992 on the finding that Jagtar Singh was in possession of the land in question for more than 12 years. Respondent No. 3 filed appeal against the order of the Consolidation Officer. Respondent No, 2 allowed the appeal on 30-10-1992 and reversed the finding of the Consolidation Officer. Jagtar Singh filed revision against the said order before the Deputy Director of Consolidation con cerned.