SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1457

S.N.AGARWAL
GANGA CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
D D C KANPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.P.Shastri, S.D.N.Singh, V.K.S.CHAUDHARY, YATINDRA SINGH,

SUDHIR NARAIN, J.

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 17th January, 1983 passed by the Deputy Direc tor of Consolidation, respondent No. 1, whereby the revision filed by the contesting respondents was allowed and the objection of the petitioner filed under Section 9 of U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was dismissed.

The parties are related to each other as given in the following pedigree:-

Kalika Prasad

Bachchan Gajodhar Gurdayal Ayodhya Lal Prasad (Died) Prasad (Died) (Died) Ganga Prasad

Ganga Radha Jai Charan Charan Prakash

2. The dispute relates to the land which belonged to Bachchan Lal and Gajodhar. The petitioner claims that they executed a registered sale deed in his favour on 12th August, 1964 and he was entitled for muta tion of his name in respect of the land trans ferred to him by the sale deed. He filed a mutation application before the Tahsildar concerned. In that mutation proceeding Bachchan Lal moved an application on 22. 2. 1965 stating that the name of the petitioner be mutated in the revenue record statement of a party made in another proceeding can be used to confront such party when he appears in the evid











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top