SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 249

R.A.SHARMA, S.RAFAT ALAM
BINDESHWARI SAHAI SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT U P LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Dobhal,

The petitioner was appointed as Overseer in Tube-well Division Faizabad in 1955. The pay-scale of Overseer was revised from time to time. Vide order dated 21-9-1982 passed by the Executive Engineer, Chittorgarh Reservoir Division Balrampur, district Gonda, the petitioners salary was fixed at Rs. 900 per month with effect from 1-7-1979. Thereafter, he was paid salary at the said rate regularly. In 1991 the petitioner was promoted to the post of Assistant Engineer in the Department. On 30-6-1993 he retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation. After retirement he has been paid provisional pension and 90% amount on the gratuity vide order dated 1-11-1993. However, vide letter dated 3-9-

1994 the Accounts Officer in the Office of Chief Engineer, U. P. Lucknow informed the respondent No. 3 that the fixation of the petitioners salary vide order dated 21-9-1982 with effect from 1-7-1979 at Rs. 930 was wrong and in fact ha ought to have been paid at the rate of Rs. 890 per month with effect from 1-7-1979. His salary was, accordingly, refixed with effect from 1-7-1979 at the rate of Rs. 890 per month. Thereafter, vide order dated 25-2-1915 a sum of Rs. 15,709 which is said to












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top