S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation dismissing the revision of Ram Samuj, the petitioner, upholding the order passed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) in appeal whereunder plot No. 128 having a total area of 6 decimals had been ordered to be taken out of the consolidation scheme, the petitioner has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the appellate as well as revisional court order. During the pendency of the writ petition, learned counsel for the respondents had filed a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith the certified copy of the relevant chak map showing the position of plot No. 128 in dispute which has now been renumbered as plot No. 218.

2. I have heard Sri S. N. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. N. Singh, learned Counsel representing the contesting respondent No. 3 and have perused the record.

3. The plot No. 128 area 6 decimals in dispute stood recorded as the Bhumidhari holding of Shiv Nayak, respondent No. 3. The petitioner asserts that a portion of plot No. 128 in dispute having an area of. 3 decimals had been reserved for village Abadi and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document