SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 234

S.N.AGARWAL
MURLIDHAR – Appellant
Versus
XITH ADDL D J MEERUT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAI RAJENDRA, Pankaj Mithal, R.B.Singhal, R.K.Ganguly,

SUDHIR NARAIN, J.

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 21-7-1990 passed by the Prescribed Authority, respondent No. 2, releasing the shop in question in favour of landlord-respondent No. 3 under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the order dated 18-1-1996 dismissing the appeal against the aforesaid order.

2. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner is a tenant of shop No. 55 situate in Subhash Bazar, District Meerut, Smt. Ram Kali Devi was the owner and landlady of the shop. She filed an application for release under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Act on 6-8-1984 against the petitioner on the allegation that her son, Kailash Chandra was employed as clerk in Income Tax Department. He was not keeping good health and he had also taken premature retirement. He was unemployed. It was further stated that his two sons, namely, Krishna Gopal Gupta and Dinesh Chandra Gupta were also unemployed. They were aged 26 and 24 years. The shop in question was required for carrying on business by Kailash Chandra, Krishna Gopal Gupta and Dinesh Chandra Gupta. They required the shop f
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top