SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 704

R.S.DHAVAN, A.B.SRIVASTAVA
BIMLA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Mohiley, B.K.NARAYANA, DHRUVA NARAYANA,

RAVI S. DHAVAN, J.

This writ petition is about constitutions made unauthorisedly and the scope of condoning the unauthorised structures by an exercise known as compounding. The issue plainly is on what is the concept, in urban planning, of condoning an unauthorised construction on the payment of a penalty and at what stage an unauthorised construction falls within the realm of an illegal act, the condonation of which the law does not permit under any circumstances.

2. The facts on record in this case are:

In Allahabad, the north sector of it, at the crossing of Beli Road and Batuk Krishna Banerjee Road, is a property which originally was owned by Lt. General D. W. Chakrovorti. It was purchased subsequently by the late Kedar Nath Tiwari, who became its owner. The municipal number of the property is 2-A, Beli Road. Kedar Nath Tiwari died leaving the property in the hands, of his heirs, namely, Smt. Bimala Devi, his widow and Shri Nirmal Chandra Tiwari, his son. During the pendency of the present writ petition, Nirmal Chandra Tiwari, the petitioners No. 2, died. His heirs were permitted to be brought on record.

3. The facts which become issues between the petitioners, the Allahabad Dev

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top