SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1346

S.N.AGARWAL
SITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION DISTRICT JAUNPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.Srivastava,

SUDHIR NARAIN, J.

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30th July, 1986 passed by the Deputy Director of Con solidation, Jaunpur, respondent No. 1 whereby the names of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been directed to be mutated in the revenue records.

2. The facts, in brief, are that respon dent Nos. 2 and 3 filed application for muta tion of their names in the revenue records before the Assistant Consolidation Officer on the allegation that Budhi Ram had ex ecuted a sale-deed in respect of the land in dispute on 16th August, 1975 in their favour and their names should be recorded in the revenue records. The petitioner, claiming herself as daughter of Budhi Ram, filed ob jection denying that any sale-deed was ex ecuted by Budhi Ram as alleged by respon dents No. 2 and 3. It was further contended that the Settlement Officer Consolidation had granted permission on 7th August, 1975 for execution of the sale-deed with a condi tion that the sale- deed could be executed within one week but the sale-deed was ex ecuted on 16th August, 1975 and in these circumstances the execution of the sale-deed shall be taken to have been done without obtaining permission of the Settle ment













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top