SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1334

B.M.LAL, B.K.SHARMA
AMAR JYOTI RICE AND GENERAL MILLS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


B. K. SHARMA, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2. F. A. F. O. No. 498 of 1996 was finally disposed of by the Bench consisting of Honble Om Prakash and R. K. Singh, JJ. on 14. 8. 96 with the observations that the im pugned recovery will remain stayed against the appellant during the pendency of the suit, provided the appellant deposits the price of levy rice at the rate of Rs. 510. 40. per quintal and furnishes adequate security for the difference to the satisfaction of the Court below within three weeks. The present application has been moved by the plaintiff- appellant with the allegation that it immediately applied for certified copy of the order dated 14. 8. 96, but the file was not traceable, hence it could not get certified copy of the said order till date, and that the office may be directed to trace the file and issue a certified copy forthwith that the mill in question has been attached during this period and that it is essential to direct the respondents to correct the period men tioned in the judgment and order dated 14. 8. 96 from the date of delivery of certified copy of the order of the High Court and withdraw the attachment at least for a period of three we










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top