S. P. SRIVASTAVA, J.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel representing respondents No. 1 and 2.

2. Perused the record.

3. Feeling aggrieved by the notice dated 17-10-96 issued by the District Panchayat Raj Adhikari, Agra acting in the exercise of the jurisdiction envisaged under Section 14 of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947

read with Rule 33-Kha (1) (2) of the Rules framed there under intimating the petitioner that a meeting for consider ing the motion of no confidence received against him will be held on 13-11-96 under the Presidentship of the Assistant Development Officer, Sainya indicating the procedure to be adopted in holding the meeting and consideration of the motion of no confidence, the petitioner has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the aforesaid notice.

4. Gram Panchayat, Bhilwali consists of Pradhan and thirteen members, the petitioner had been elected as Pradhan of Gram Panchayat, Bhilwali By persons registered in the electoral rolls for the territorial constituencies of the Panchayat area.

5. Under the provisions contained in the Constitution (Seventy- third Amend ment) Act, 1992 which rec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document