SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 1202

D.K.SETH
MUNNA LAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
COMMANDING OFFICER 388 DSC PLATOON C O D KANPUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK KUMAR, Sharad Varma,

D. K. SETH, J.

By the notice dated 4-5-1989 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) the petitioner was asked to show cause as to why his recruitment in Defence Security Corp. (herein-after referred to as DSC) should not be considered irregular on the ground that the petitioner having been dis charged compulsorily under Army Rule 13 (3) (HI) (V) who are ineligible for recruit ment m DSC. After considering the show cause the petitioner was discharged by an order dated 1-5-1984 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition ). The petitioner made a peti tion on 18-8-1989 as also on 5-10-1989 (An-nexure-7 to the petition) to the Chief of Army Staff, which was rejected by him vide order dated 24-11-1989 (Annexure-8 to the writ petition) alongwith these two or ders the petitioner has also challenged the order dated 5-8-1988 by which the petitioner was discharged from Army under Rule 13 (3) of the said Rules, by means of present writ petition with the following prayers:

" (i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite par ties to produce the entire record of the case before this Honble Court.

(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top