SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 466

A.N.GUPTA
RAM ASHRAI MISRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


A. N. GUPTA, J.

On 8-6-1985 one Radha Krishna Misra lodged an F. I. R. against opposite party No. 2 and three o there on the basis of which case crime No. 142 of 1985 under Section 342/323,1. P. C. was registered at police station Jathwara District Pratapgarh. The police inves tigated the case and filed charge-sheet. Charges under Section 342/323, I. P. C. were framed against the accused persons. Both the offences are bailable but the of fence under Section 342 is cognizable whereas Section 323, I. P. C. is non- cog nizable. The case is proceeding as a war rant trial. In the year 1990, prosecution had examined two witnesses of fact. The other witnesses of fact were not examined probably because they are said to have filed their affidavits in favour of the accused persons. When the case was taken on 26-6-1995 for prosecution evidence, on behalf of the prosecution an application was moved to summon the witnesses by issuing non-bailable warrants of arrest. The learned Magistrate by observing that since 1990, twenty five dates have been given but the prosecution did not examine any other witness rejected the application, closed the prosecution evidence and fixed the case for recording









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top