SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 880

I.M.QUDDUSI
JAVED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.Farooq Ansari,

I. M. QUDDUSI, J.

The present ap peal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 1-8-1994 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge in Special Case No. 28 of 1993 convicting and sentencing the appellant to undergo for ten years RI under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2. According to the prosecution case on 20-8-1993 at about 5. 50 p. m. the Station Officer of P. S. Babina, district Jhansi namely, R. P. Yadav alongwith Head Constable Ramesh Prasad Tiwari and other police constables were returning after making investigation in case Crime No. 182 of 1993, under Sections 395 and 397, IPC. The appellant was seen coming from Kasba Babina towards the curve of In-dogulf factory.

When he saw the police Jeep he left the road and started taking fast steps. He was chased thereafter by the lice party and caught him on the field, is name was asked who told his name Javed son of Mohd. Rizavee, R/o. Kalina Kumbha Road, Santa Cruz, Bombay. His search was taken in the presence of police personnels and a polythene packet con taining Charas was recovered from the front right pocket of Jeans. He could not show any licence for that. The appellant told




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top