S.K.PHAUJDAR
RASHEEDAN – Appellant
Versus
AMAR SINGH – Respondent
The matter was heard on 18-2-97 on the point of admission in presence of the defendant-appellant and the plaintiff-respondents appearing as caveators. The concerned suit was filed by the respondents for setting aside a sale deed and for permanent injunction. It was stated that the sale deed was obtained by in personation and the plaintiffs had not executed it. There was no agreement for sale between the plaintiffs and the defendant. According ly, the prayer for cancellation was made together with an injunction against the defendant to restrain them from disturbing the possession of the plaintiffs.
2. It was the defence case that the plaintiffs had no cause of action as the suit property was sold away to defendant No. 1 by a sale deed dated 21-4-89 which was duly execute by the plaintiffs. The defendant No. 1, from the date of the aforesaid sale became a bhoomidhar with transferable right and was in possession of the suit property by cultivation. The suit was stated to be barred under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act. The suit was also not maintainable under Sec tion 331 of the U. P. Z. A. & L. R. Act. The Munsiff decreed the suit and cancelled the concerned sale
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.