R. R. K. TRIVEDI, J.

In both the aforesaid writ petitions, petitioner and respondent No. 3 in the first petition and respondent No. 4 in the second petition are common. Both the writ petitions thus can be decided by a common order against which learned counsel for the parties have no ob jection. Writ Petition No. 1351 of 1996 shall be the leading case.

2. Facts giving rise to the aforesaid two petitions are that respondent No. 3 Ram Singh raised industrial dispute with regard to termination of his employment from the petitioner mill with effect from 1-11- 1991. The dispute was referred to the Labour Court by the State Government vide order dated 22-9- 1993, under Section 4-K of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ( here in after referred to as the Act ). In the Labour Court this case was registered as Adjudication Case No. 151 of 1993. Before the Labour Court both the parties appeared and filed written statement. Case of respon dent No. 3 was that on knowing that in the petitioner mill there is a need of some workmen, he made an application in the month of March, 1990 for being employed. On 1- 5-1990, he was employed in the mill under some contractor. Since then respon dent No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document