SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 796

G.S.N.TRIPATHI
SAJID – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
VIRENDRA MISHRA,

G. S. N. TRIPATHI, J.

Accused Sajid, Manjoora and Akbar have been convicted on a charge under Section 395, I. P. C. and sentenced to undergo 5 years R. I. Accused Nanhey has been convicted on a charge under Section 412, I. P. C. and sentenced to undergo 5 years R. I. The order of conviction and sentence was recorded by the then IV Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad by his judgment and order dated 23-11-1979 passed in S. T. No. 636 of 78, District Moradadad.

2. The complainant Masudul Hasan, PW 1 lodged the report at the police station Hayatnagar, district Moradabad on 27-11-1977 at 4 p. m. The distance of the police station is 7 miles. The incident is said to have been taken place on 26-11-1977/27-11-1977 at 12 midnight. It is alleged in the F. I. R. that in the night of occurrrence the complainant was sleeping at his tubwell. His servant Ghulam was also there (Ghulam not produced ). At about 12 midnight, the complainant got up to make water when he was arrested by six persons. One of them had single barrel gun, two had pistols and three had lathies. On the point of gun, they removed two pattas of the tubewell, one bucket, one cushion, one wrench and one bag of calcium fertiliser
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top