SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 1312

D.K.SETH
SADARUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT JUDGE ALLD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Haider Husain,

D. K. SETH, J.

Leave is granted to convert this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.

2. By means of this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the order dated 20-12-1988 passed by Sri B. B. Agarwal, District Judge, Allahabad in Civil Revision No. 378 of 1988, affirming the order dated 23-9-1988 passed by the Addi tional Munsif, Allahabad in Suit No. 833 of 1985. The fact of the case, inter alia, was that the respondent No. 3, filed a Suit for declaration of the sale-deed as void or cancellation thereof against the petitioners alleging that he was bhumidhar in respect of the disputed land alongwith his brother, respondent No. 4 and that the petitioner got the sale-deed executed in their favour in respect of the disputed land through imposter and, as such, the sale deed is void and is liable to be cancelled.

3. The petitioners as defendants contended in their written statement that the suit for cancellation of the alleged void document, in view of the assertions, made in the plaint was not maintainable and was barred under Section 331 of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, herein after-referred to as the said Act, by an order dated 23-9-1988 the l




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top