SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 187

S.R.SINGH
ARUNA GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.KUMAR, Sheo Pujan Singh,

S. R. SINGH, J.

Heard Sri N. K. Pandey holding brief of Sri A. Kumar counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sheo Pujan Singh, Standing Counsel for State Authorities.

2. The petition on hand has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner in C. T. Grade with effect from 19-2-19s6 and in L. T. Grade with effect from 19-2-1991. The basis of the claim is the Government Order, dated 19-10-1989 as amended by G. O. dated 2-12-1990.

3. Petitioner, it is not disputed, was appointed as a permanent Assis tant Teacher in B. T. C. Grade on 19- 2-1989. He completed 5 years of sub stantive service in B. T. C. Grade on 19-2-1986. Since he was possessed of B. A. B. Ed. degrees, he became entitled to C. T. Grade on completion of 5 years of substantive service in terms of Regulation 7 (2) of Chapter II of the Regulations made under U, P. Intermediate Education Act which reads as under ;-

4. The fact that the aforesaid provision was deleted by means of Noti fication No. 4168/15-7-10 (160)- 1991 T. C.-Lucknow, dated 19-8-1992 would not affect the right already acquired by petitioner. The Government Order dated 19-8-1992 omitting Regulation 7 (2) ca










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top