SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 52

BRIJESH KUMAR, A.N.GUPTA
Y K SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


A. N. GUPTA, J.

In this batch of writ petitions, the valid, "type of the provisions contained in the U. P. Trade Tax Act, formerly known as the U. P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter REFERRED TO as "the U. P. Act"), relating to imposition of sales tax on works contracts has been challenged. Since these petitions involve common questions, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.

Before the, Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1982, indivisible works contracts were not eligible to sales tax due to judicial pronouncements. To overcome this difficulty, the Constitution was amended and the Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act came into force with effect from February 3, 1983. It introduced clause (29a) to article 366, clause (b) of which is material which runs as follows :

" 366. Definitions.- In this Constitution, unless the context otherwise requires, the following expressions have the meanings hereby respectively assigned to them, that is to say -

(29a) tax on the sale or purchase of goods includes -

(a ). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(b) a tax on the transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) involved in the execution of a works c




























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top