HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
M.Katju
VINOD KUMAR SHARMA
Versus
D I O S MORADABAD
Decided On : 26 May 1995
Civil Misc. W. P. No. 14962 of 1995
Suspension - Reinstatement - Criminal Appeal - Section 302 IPC
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Lecturer, was convicted under Section 302 IPC and placed under suspension. His suspension was revoked, and he sought reinstatement while his criminal appeal was pending.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that reinstatement could only occur if the criminal appeal resulted in acquittal, not merely on a stay or bail order. It cited precedents to support the position that dismissal for conviction under Section 302 IPC should not be stayed, even if there is a stay or bail order.
Issues: The issue was whether the petitioner could be reinstated while his criminal appeal for conviction under Section 302 IPC was pending.
Ratio Decidendi: The court established that reinstatement could only happen if the criminal appeal resulted in acquittal, and that dismissal for conviction under Section 302 IPC should not be stayed, even if there is a stay or bail order.
Final Decision: The writ petition seeking reinstatement was dismissed by the court.
The petitioner was a Lecturer in a college and he has been convicted under Section 302 I. P. C. He was placed under suspension but surprisingly his suspension was revoked.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the peti tioners appeal against his conviction is pending in High Court. In my opinion the petitioner can be reinstated |in [service only if his criminal appeal is allowed and not merely on stay order or bail order.
3. in Special Appeal No. 66 of 1993, decided on 17-8-1994 it has been held that the services of an employee can be terminated even if his criminal appeal is pending in High Court. The Supreme Court in 1995 (3) J. T. page 32 has held that even if there is a stay or bail order in a criminal appeal it is wholly irrelevant in respect of the dismissal for the conviction under Section 302 I. P. C. Thus the law on this point is very clear that even if the conviction under Section 302 has been stayed by the High Court, the dismissal should not be stayed. It is only if the criminal appeal is allowed and the petitioner is acquitted then he is entitled to be reinstated. It is surprisingly that the petitioner who has been convicted under Section 302 I. P. C. is praying fur reinstatement as a teacher in a college. What will be the fate of such a college and what influence will be on the mind of the students of that college can well be imagined. It is surprisingly that now-a days such persons are teachers. This court cannot think of a worse kind of practice.
4. With these observation, the writ petition is dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.