SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 569

R.B.MEHROTRA
KUNDANLAL – Appellant
Versus
GHANSHYAM DASS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Janardan Sahai, R.P.Gael,

K. B. MEHROTRA, J.

All the aforesaid appeals are connected with each other and arise out of a common judgment wherein the Additional Civil Judge, Mathura allowed three civil appeals of Ghanshyam Das, being Civil Appeal Nos. 106 of 1975, 107 of 1975 and 108 of 1975.

2. Original Suit No. 34 of 1968 was filed by Ghanshyam Das against Kanchan Singh, Suit No. 634 of 1968 was filed by Hira Lal against Ghan-Bhyam Das and others and Kanchan Singh also filed suit against

Ghanshyam Das being Suit No. 419 of 1970. Munsif, Mathura vide his common judgment dated 29-9- 1975 decided all the three suits together and suit of plaintiff Ghanshyam Das was dismissed with costs and suits of Kanchan Singh and Hira La! were decided with costs. Aggrieved by the aforesaid decision, Ghan shyam Das preferred three first appeals, reference whereof has already been made. The Additional Civil Judge, Mathura vide his judgment dated 8-5-1979 Allowed all the three appeals, dismissed the suit of Kanchan Singh and Hira I al and decreed the suit of Ghanshyam Das, Aggrieved thereby the present three second appeals have been filed. Hira Lal is the brother of Kundan Lal and was co-plaintiff in original suit No. 634 of 19






































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top