S. P. SRIVASTAYA, J.

Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in a revision filed by the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 under Section 48 of the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act whereunder allowing the revision and upsetting the order of the Consolidation Officer upheld by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation in appeal, the present petitioner was found to be disentitled to inherit any right, title or interest of late Udai Bhan Singh in the holdings indispute on the ground that he could not be held to be the legitimate son Of the deceased tenure-holder and directing for the correction of the basic year entry in the record of right standing in the name of Udai Bhan Singh by recording therein the names of his grandsons Udai Pratap Singh and Vijai Pratap Singh only.

2. The petitioner has now approached this court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the revisional order.

3. There is no dispute and this fact is also borne out from the record that Udai Pratap Singh and Vijai Pratap Singh, the contesting respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are the sons of the pre-deceased son of Udai Bhan Singh. It is also not disputed that Krishna Pratap, the petitioner is the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document