SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 1155

R.K.MAHAJAN, B.M.LAL
DEEPA VASHISTHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prakash Padia, R.G.PADIA,

B. M. LAL, J.

By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner-Salt. Deepa Vashistha challenges an order dated 26-9-1995, passed by the Director, Higher Education, U. P. , Allahabad (respondent No. 2) contained in Annexure 28 to this petition.

2. By the order impugned, while rejecting petitioners representations dated 6-8-1995, 25-8-1995 and 28-8-1995, she is directed to join at Ranikhet, district Almora where she has been transferred vide order dated 4-6-1994 (Annexure 2 ).

3. For brevity of the case, few facts which are necessary to be stated for the purpose of this case, are thus :

4. Petitioner Smt. Deepa Vashistha, is a Lecturer (Vocal Music) pre sently posted at Government Post Graduate Degree College, Rampur,

5. Petitioners husband-Dr. S. C. Vashistha is also in Government service and presently posted at Project Officer, Non-Formal Education, at Rampur. Thus, husband wife both are at Rampur.

6. The order dated 4-6-1994 transferring the petitioner from Rampur to Ranikhet referred to above, was challenged by the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 674 of 1994 before Lucknow Bench of this Court, and that petition was finally disposed of vide order dated 1-





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top