R.A.SHARMA, I.M.QUDDUSI
SUSHIL CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
Petitioner in writ petition No. 2020 of 1995 is an advocate of this Court. Petitioner No. 1 in writ petition No. 3587 of 1995 is registered Association of the Employees and Officers of U. P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), of which petitioner No. 2 is the President. They have filed these writ petitions challeng ing the thirteenth amendment dated September 7, 1994 of the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation of Function) Regulation, 1954, made under the proviso to clause (3) of Article 320 of the Constitution dispensing with the consultation with the Commission on the matters relating to appoint ment by promotion to the State Civil service and
post and the principle to be followed in making such appointment. Consultation with the Commission as regards the appointment by direct recruitment to ibe State Civil service and post has also been reduced/curtailed substantially.
2. Both the Commission and the State Government have filed their counter-affidavits and the petitioner has filed rejoinder-affidavit in reply thereto. We have heard Sri Ashok Bhushan, learned counsel for the peti tioner, Sri Rakesh Owive
REFERRED TO : Janta Dal v. H. C. Chaudhary
Bangalore Medical Trust v. B. S. Muddappa
S. P. Gupta v. President of India
Jai Shanker Prasad v. State of Bihar
S. B. K. Oil Mills v. Subhash Chandra Yograj Sinha
R. S. Swamiji v. Slate of Mysore
Madhu Gopal v. VI Additional District Judge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.