Petitioners, by means of this petition challenge the validity of the order dated 4-9-1995, contained in Annexure II to the writ petition, passed by the opposite party No. 1.

2. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that election of office bearers and members of the committee of management was held on 12-12-1993, In the said election the petitioner was elected as manager of the committee of management. It has further been stated that the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity of being heard or to defend and the impugned order dated 4-9-1993 was passed by respondent No. 1 at the behest of respondent No. 2. It has further been stated that the term of the Committee of Management cannot be cut short, petitioner was thus, entitled to continue in the office till 12-12-1995, and the impugned order passed by the respon dent No. 1 was wholly illegal and without jurisdiction and was liable to be quashed.

3. Counter-affidavit was filed on behalf of contesting respondent controverting the fact stated in the writ petition. It has further been stated that on serious charges of embezzlement etc. the committee of management resolved to remove the petitione