SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 973

R.B.MEHROTRA
SRIKANT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAM KESARI DEVI – Respondent


R. B. MEHROTRA, J.

The present second appeal has been instituted by defendant appellant.

2. The essential facts necessary for adjudication of the appeal are as under;

Dhannu Singh and Smt. Ramkesari Devi who is daughter-in-law of Dhanni Singh, filed Suit No. 48/5 in the Court of Sixth Additional Munsif Ghazipur against Srikant and in that suit prayed for the relief that the sale deed dated 20-11-1974 executed by Dhannu Singh in favour of Srikant be cancelled and it be declared that the said sale deed is void.

3. According to the plaintiff-defendants so committed fraud (sic) Dhannu Singh and got executed the sale deed dated 28-1-1974 in respect of the property: in suit in favour, The plaintiff has alleged as under in the suit. The following pedigree with regard to plaintiff and defendant is worthy of mention :

Inarman Singh

Mahangi Singh Begam Singh

Laxman Singh Chandra Singh Shiobarat Salik Ram Barat

Naurang Singh Dhannu Jagannath. (plff No. 1) Srikant (Defendant) Brahma

Ram Kesari (widow) (plft. No. 2)

Sharda (son)

Dhannu Singh plaintiff number ones son was Brahma Singh Brahma Singhs wife Ramkesari Devi was plaintiff No, 2 Brahma Singh had died earlier. The present suit has been fil







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top