This is the first bail application by the applicant Radhey Shyam who is involved in Crime Case No. 506/1993 under Sections 302, 307, 504, 506, IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act of police station Sarai Inayat, district Allahabad.

2. I have heard Sri Dilip Kumar learned counsel for the applicant and Sri V. C. Tewari Senior Advocate on behalf of the complainant and the learned A. G. A.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has urged the first ground that since the applicant challenged his identity and involvement in the crime and prayed for identification parade but he was refused, he should be enlarged on bail. In sport of his contention, he has cited decisions of this Court in bail application of Budhsen v. State, (1992) 29 ACC 676; 1992 JIC 681 (All) and also a decision in the bail application of Yogendra v. State of U. P. , 1993, UP Crr 383: 1993 JIC 522 (All ). These cases have also made references to the earlier decisions of this Court in Madan Mohan Singh v. State of U. P. , 1986 (23) ACC 110. Shakeel v. State of U. P. , 1988 (3) Crimes 796, Suresh Chandra v. State, 1989 ACC 250 and Ramesh and others v. State of U. P. , 1985 (22) ACC 42.

4. On