While allowing this writ petition we directed that reasons for our judgment shall be given later on. We are now giving reasons for our judgment.

2. The question, which arises for consideration in this case, is as to whether th^ Chancellor, Kashi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi (hereinafter referred to as the University) has jurisdiction to entertain and decide the representation of the petitioner under Section 68 of the U. P. State Universities Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). In pursuance of the General Orders, passed by the Government of India, the University Grant Commission (hereinafter referred to as the U, G. C.) on the basis of directive principle, of State Policies in order to promote literacy and social awareness in the people who are below the poverty line, approved the scheme under the Adult and Continuing Education and Extension Department Centre, In this scheme one of the posts sanctioned was that of Project Officer. It is alleged that after the sanction was received, the University advertised the post of Project Officer. It was indicated in the advertisement that the post of project officer is temporary but is likely to continue till March, 1990.