K.C.BHARGAVA, N.B.ASTHANA
RAM NIWAS PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U P – Respondent
All the aforemen tioned writ petitions relate to the same con troversy involving similar question of facts and law regarding reservation for the post of Professors, hence these writ petitions have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. The facts, in short, which are relevant for the purposes of disposal of these writ petitions, are that one post of Professor in Political Science, one post of Professor in the department of Sanskrit, one post of Professor in Medieval and Modern History, one post of Professor in the depart ment of Applied Economics fell vacant be tween June 1989 to September, 1993. For filling up all these posts Lucknow Univer sity issued an advertisement No. 5/1993, copy of which is contained in Annexure-1, giving the number of posts required in dif ferent departments. In pursuance of this advertisement applications were invited from the eligible candidates. Last date for submission of application Forms was 20th October, 1993. Interview letters for these posts were issued sometimes in March 1994 and the interview of the candidates took place between 4. 4. 94 to 22. 4. 94 by the Selec tion Committee. The Selection Com
REFERRED TO : Chakradhar Paswan v. State of Bihar and Others
Chetana Dilip Motghare v. Bhide Girls Education Society, Nagpur and others
Suresh Chandra Verma and Other v. The Chancellor
A.P. Public Service Commission, Hyderabad and. Others v. B. Sarat Chandra and Others
N. T. Devin Katt and others v. Karnatak Public Service Commission and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.