SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(All) 5

GOPI NATH, SATISH CHANDRA
SRI RAM CHARAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
PYARE LAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.BHARGAVA, G.P.BHARGAWA, Girdhar Malviya,

This is a defendants appeal. It arises out of a suit for ejectment of the appellant from a shop and for recovery of Rs. 9/- as arrears of rent. The claim for ejectment was made on the ground that the plaintiff- respondent had obtained a permission under Section 3 of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as the Act, for instituting a suit for ejectment against the appellant.

2. The suit was resisted on a variety of grounds, one of them being that no valid permission under Section 3 of the Act existed at the time the suit was filed. Since that is the only question argued in this appeal we give the facts with reference to that question above.

3. The plaintiff-respondent applied for permission under Section 3 of the Act which was granted by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer on 11-3-1966. The defendant filed a revision against that order and the Commissioner passed a stay order dated March 30, 1966. The stay order was served on the respondents wife by refusal on 6-4-1966. The suit giving rise to the present appeal was filed on 25th April, 1966. The revision was ultimately dismissed and a representation to the State Government under Sec











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top