GOPI NATH, SATISH CHANDRA
SRI RAM CHARAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
PYARE LAL – Respondent
2. The suit was resisted on a variety of grounds, one of them being that no valid permission under Section 3 of the Act existed at the time the suit was filed. Since that is the only question argued in this appeal we give the facts with reference to that question above.
3. The plaintiff-respondent applied for permission under Section 3 of the Act which was granted by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer on 11-3-1966. The defendant filed a revision against that order and the Commissioner passed a stay order dated March 30, 1966. The stay order was served on the respondents wife by refusal on 6-4-1966. The suit giving rise to the present appeal was filed on 25th April, 1966. The revision was ultimately dismissed and a representation to the State Government under Sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.