SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(All) 426

H.N.SETH
Mangal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


H. N. SETH, J.

( 1 ) BY this application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. Mangal and four others pray that the proceedings initiated against them under Section 133 Cr. P. C. and the conditional order passed thereon dated 11th May, 1976 as also the direction issued under Section 142 Cr. P. C. on 15th May, 1976 be quashed.

( 2 ) ONE Babu Ram filed an application In the court of Sub-divisional Magistrate, Sikandrabad on 10th May, 1976 praying that proceeding under Section 133 Cr. P. C. be taken against the applicants who had made certain encroachment on the public way. Babu Ram put in another application under Section 142 Cr. P. C. mentioning that despite protest Mangal and others were continuing to make further construction and that they should be restrained from doing so. On both these applications the sub-divisional Magistrate made an order on 11th May, 1976 which read thus: Seen the papers and the eifidavit produced before me. Issue conditional! order Under Section 133 Cr. P. C. and injunction order Under Section 142 Cr. P. C. In pursuance of this order following notice under the signature of Link Officer was drawn up:

Whereas an inquiry info the conditional order issued by me today is










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top