SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(All) 622

V.N.KHARE
MALLO – Appellant
Versus
BAKHTAWAR – Respondent


When this second appeal was heard it appeared that the parties may settle the dispute by negotiated compromise. Since no compromise was arrived at I proceed to dispose of the appeal on its merit.

2. This second appeal arises out of suit filed by plaintiff-respondent for cancellation of gift deed dated 1- 8-1974 registered on 20-9-1974 with respect to the property detailed at the foot of the plaint partly situate in village Bilsoori and partly in village Derha, Pargana Sikandarabad, District Bulandshahr.

3. In brief the plaint. allegations were that the defendant-appellants, Mst. Mallo, Mst. Narain and Mst. Kalawati are the three married daughters of plaintiff-respondent, Mst. Bakhtawari. The plaintiff is the widow for last 30 years. The defendant-appellant, Mst. Mallo on 30-7-1974 came to the plaintiffs house along with her husband and asked her to move an application for giving her entire land to all the three daughters equally after her death and for that purpose took her to Sikandarabad on 1-8-1974. At Sikandarabad Mst. Malloo and her husband Jaspal Singh, in collusion with the scribe obtained the

plaintiff-respondents thumb impressions on several papers on the pretext that thos





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top