R.M.SAHAI
RAJ BALI PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION DEORIA – Respondent
By way of this petition the petitioner has challenged the power of the Magistrate to impose fine for use of land reserved for public utility for purposes other than agriculture as detailed in sub-paragraph (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 5 of U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. The proceedings started on a complaint, filed by opposite party, on 25th November, 1969 for taking action against the petitioner as he encroached and was making constructions over the land reserved for abadi without permission of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation. The Magistrate found that the land originally belonged to petitioner but it was reserved for extension of abadi during consolidation proceedings. and the petitioner was given other land in lieu of it. As the land did not belong to him and it was owned by Gaon Sabha the petitioner was guilty of making constructions over it and was liable to be penalised under Section 45a of the Consolidation Act.
Section 45a is penal section. It empowers the competent court to impose a fine not exceeding Rs. 1000. 00, but the conviction can be for breach of Section 5 (1) (C) which runs as follows:
(C) "notwithstanding anything contained in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.