SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(All) 469

K.N.SINGH, B.D.AGARWAL
MOHAN LAL MEHROTRA – Appellant
Versus
COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA NEW DELHI – Respondent


B. D. AGARWAL, J.

The petitioners, who are Section Officers in the office of the Accountant General I, II and III, Allahabad, have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for restraining the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 from promoting respondent No. 4, 5 and 6 who are also working as Section Officers and belong to the Scheduled Castes, to the post of Accounts Officers.

The petitioners case is that they are senior to respondents Nos. 4, 5 and 6 and they cannot be promoted to the posts of Accounts Officers, through seniority quota, before the petitioners. The promotion to the posts of Accounts Officers is regulated by the rules made by the President in exercise of powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 and clause (5) of Article 148 of the Constitu tion, after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India. These rules are known as indian Audit & Accounts Department (Administra tive Officers, Assistant Accounts Officers, and Assistant Audit Officers) Recruit ment Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ). A copy of these rules has been annexed as C. A. I, to the counter-affidavit of Shri P. P. Dhir, Account ant General U. P. I, Allahabad. T






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top