SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 319

R.R.RASTOGI
LADHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
KANPUR NAGAR MAHAPALIKA – Respondent


R. R. RASTOGI, J.

This is plaintiffs Second Appeal arising out of a suit filed by him for permanent injunction restraining the defendant-respondent Nagar Mahapalika, Kanpur, through the Administrator, Nagar Mahapalika, Kanpur, its employees, agents, and Inspectors etc. from demolishing the Chhajja of plaintiffs house situated in No. 124-A/53, Govind Nagar, Kanpur. The case taken by the plaintiff-appellant was that he had made the construction according to the approved and sanctioned plan but on 28th of July, 1967 two inspectors of the defendant along with two peons came and demolished the three Chhajjas of the plaintiffs house. He filed a criminal complaint and reconstructed the aforesaid three Chhajjas. It was alleged that no notice had been given to him by the defendant before demolishing the Chhajjas.

The suit was contested by the defendant, inter alia, on the ground that "a notice under Section 10 of the U. P. Regulation of Buildings Operation Act of 1985 had been given to the plaintiff" but he refused to accept the same. It was also contended that the disputed Chhajjas had not been made according to the sanctioned plan.

The trial Court framed several issues and held that the d


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top